Turning the National Capital into a Fortress

 

Turning the National Capital into a Fortress

The Union Home Ministry, out of panic and insecurity, moved to fortify Delhi against the protest called on October 10,2026 at Jantar Matar by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), the All-India Students’ Association and others to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Gyanesh Kumar, for the vote chori.  

 

The previous day, the national capital was locked down by deploying more than 40,000   Delhi policemen and central forces, including the Border Security Force and the Rapid Action Force, to pre-empt the protest march; and with Jantar Mantar and Delhi borders sealed; hundreds of outstation trains reaching Delhi halted; Metro stations closed; checkpoints every  hundred metres,  concrete barriers and  spike strips laid across the roads, internet shutdown, shops and hotels closed, Delhi looked like a war zone as if preparing to fight an invading enemy.

 

The state was fighting against its own people.  The unarmed youth were treated like the enemy of the nation. They were not allowed to protest peacefully, despite the fundamental right to protest guaranteed in the constitution, causing more hardship to ordinary people than what the protest would have caused otherwise.  However, the State forces could not stop the flash protests by a group of people coming on the streets at different locations chanting slogans and demanding the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar.  The might of the State machinery cannot silence the people’s voice: nor can it silence the dissenters.   

 

A ten-member delegation of INDIA bloc, led by the LoPs Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge met the President Draupadi Murmu on October 9 and presented a Memorandum demanding the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar due to the vote chori under his supervision; The Memorandum says: “We have incontrovertible proof that vote chori has taken place on a massive scale in election after election. Assembly elections in Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Bihar, Delhi and West Bengal have been stolen.” They also demanded the suspension of the ongoing SIR of electoral rolls and returning to paper ballots for all elections replacing the EVMs; and repealing of the Chef Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of service and term of office) Act 2023 that provides life-long immunity to the CEC and ECs, with a mala fide intent.

 

On the day of the protest, thousands of people were detained illegally, in violation of the law; thousands were confined to their home, and any person suspected to be marching towards Jantar Mantar was detained. With the police and the right-wing goons and goondas beating and bashing the young protesters.  The trio of the CJP – Abhijeet Dipke, Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das - were detained at the IGI Airport on their landing from Mumbai.  The next day, they were released on the orders of the Executive Magistrate at Delhi Cantt. after they signed a bond: “A bail bond a Surety Bond of Rs.50,000 was filled for maintaining peace and good behaviour for a period of one year.”

 

On October 10, Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge, Opposition Leaders in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha respectively, wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant seeking appointment on 12 October to present him a Memorandum demanding the resignation of the CEC, rollback of the SIR exercises, return to paper ballots and abandonment of EVMs, and annulment of recent State Assembly elections. The CJI refused the appointment, stating that meeting would be ‘incompatible with judicial propriety and the constitutional principle of separation of powers.”  Instead, he suggested in his letter to them that they could file a Petition listing these issues, which he assured would be heard at the earliest.

 

The campaign against the CEC got escalated. On October 11, Rahul Gandhi gave a call for Chalo Dilli urging students, civil society originations and opposition parties to join the march to the Supreme Court to save democracy: “Tomorrow, we will march to the Supreme Court as Indians, united beyond party, gender, caste, community and state. The youth, all Opposition parties, civil society groups, all those who believe in democracy and stand by the Constitution of India will walk with us. These cowards cannot intimidate us.
They will have to step aside. We will match together with love, brotherhood, and patriotism.” Referring to the protests on October 10, he said the youth, with love in their hearts, had hit the streets in Dehi to protest peacefully, but were ‘beaten by the police and BJP goons’  

 

The INDIA bloc MPs march to the Supreme Court started from the Constitution Club reached the Court late evening; and a Petition by 13 Opposition leaders was filed in the apex court raising various demands relating to the conduct of elections and the vote chori, and the partisan functioning of the CEC. An estimated crowd of 2.5 lakh people, representing students, opposition parties and their workers, journalists, advocates and civil society groups and ordinary citizens cutting across party affiliations, expressed their solidary and participated in the historical March for Democracy. This Is unprecedented in the history of Delhi in that such a large number of people marched to the Supreme Court for a larger national cause for the first time.  

 

That an elected government of world’s largest democracy turned the national capital into a Fortress, just to stop a peaceful protest by the youth, is highly condemnable, ‘using a hammer to kill a fly’.  The right to organise, assemble, and speak is at the core of democracy. To deny this fundamental constitutional right is to deny democracy. Delhi was under siege as if under a martial law.  Trains were cancelled and stopped, passengers waylaid and journalists, activists, academics, and lawyers assaulted and detained, in shocking brazen misuse and weaponisation of the very law that is meant to safeguard and protect the democracy.  In the heart of Delhi, police personnel without identification badges were seen in action. There should be some accountability for this abuse of power.

 

The editorial in The Hindu, October 12, is quite revealing:

 

 “What Delhi witnessed on Saturday (October 10) was a repeat of the police high-handedness In July against youth protesters…months later, neither the government nor the Supreme Court has held anyone accountable for the law enforcement excesses.   On October 9, the Court had said that a blanket ban on travel or assembly could not be allowed. But that is exactly what was done in Delhi, as people, including former Chief Miniters, senior politicians and lawyers, were rounded up from around the city. On Sunday (October 11), the Court in its hearing, acknowledged the urgency and seriousness of the issue, and repeated it directives.

 

But piecemeal orders and half-hearted lamentations by the Court have had no restraining impact on a government that seems to be doubling down on its practice of branding critics as foreign agents and anti-nationals instead of coming clean on its record. The BJP government is going this far in defence of an official – the Chief Election Commissioner of India, Gyanesh Kumar.   Instead of calling for accountability from the Election Commission of India which has disenrachised millions of Indians in a clear act of illegality, the BJP and its central and state governments are deploying the strong arm of the state to defend him. That itself suggests that Mr. Kumar’s relationship with the BJP is different from his relationship with all other parties. The Modi government should play by the rules and not misuse power against citizes.”

 

We can now only hope the Supreme Court will rise to this historical occasion and act without fear or favor in exercising its power of judicial review, while hearing and disposing the plethora of Petitions filed by the concerned citizens, including the one by the Opposition leaders, who represent nearly 65% of the electorate  about the functioning of the Election Commission of India, under Gyanesh Kumar, and its failure to ensure free and fair elections – a sine qua non for the success of democracy.  The Court alone can protect and safeguard the democracy in India. It cannot afford to ignore the massive national movement, the first of its kind, against the partisan role of the Election Commission of India and the Chief Election Commissioner, and sidestep from discharging its constitutional responsibility to uphold the people’s faith in judiciary and democracy.