Making
the RSS Accountable
It
is surprising to know that the Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)- the most
influential and powerful organisation, whose spare of activities extends
practically to every aspect of India society- religious, cultural, social,
political and economic- has been left unregistered by the successive national
governments, while it existed for 100 years.
The
RSS was banned by the Indian government on three occasions since the
independence. Following the assassination of the Father of the
Nation Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Pate banned the RSS on February 4, 1948 citing to
a ‘danger to public peace’ and accusing the organisation of fostering communal
hatred and creating an environment conducive to violence. The ban was lifted on
July 11, 1949, on the RSS assuring to shun politics and of good behaviour. On
July 4,1975, Indira Gandhi banned the RSS, after proclamation of the national
emergency. The ban was lifted on March 22,1977. And following the
demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the Narasimha Rao Government
outlawed the RSS on December 10,1992. The ban was lifted on June 4, 1993. The
Government of India, on all these three occasions, had failed to ensure that
the RSS registered under the Indian law. Its registration should have been a
condition for lifting the ban so that it would not engage in unlawful and
anti-national activities in future.
Addressing
the nation from the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi on August 15,2025,
Narendra Modi claimed that the RSS is the largest NGO in the world. The fact is
that the RSS is not registered under any law of the Indian government – be it
as a society or a religious-cultural organisation or a trust or an NGO - though
it is the richest and the largest world organisation, and remains unregulated
and unaccounted. It continues to dodge the law, while it is allowed to carry
nefarious unlawful activities. Strangely, the Modi government had lifted on Juy
9, 2024 the six-decades old ban prohibiting the government employees from
participating in the RSS activities, thus openly encouraging them to identify
with its divisive Hindutva ideology.
Karnataka
Home Minister Priyank Kharge wrote a letter on June 13,2026 to the RSS Chief
Mohan Bhagat wanting to know why the RSS is not registered, and asked him to
get it registered. He raised certain pertinent questions. Excerpts:
“An
organisation that claims to have over 60,000 shakhas and crores of Swayamsevaks
across India and abroad undoubtedly has a significant presence in public life
and society. It is precisely because of this scale, influence and reach the RSS
must be held in the highest standards of transparency, accountability and
constitutional compliance. The RSS has a significant footprint in Karnataka,
with 4,127 daily shakhas,1,389 weekly milans, and 60 monthly mandalis. The
organisation conducted 2,194 samajotsavas drawing nearly 20 lakh
participants…organised 562 route morchas across the state with 2,21,963
uniformed participants. Such an extensive organisational presence cannot be
treated as a private and informal arrangement. It raises legitimate questions
about legal status, accountability and financial transparency, public order,
permission, sources of funding and compliance with the constitution and laws of
India.
We
therefore request the RSS to depute its authorised office bearers to explain
the legal ground on which an organisation of such magnitude continues to
function with anonymity without being formally registered as a legal entity or
as a ‘body of individuals’ under the applicable laws. In a constitutional
democracy, no organisation can remain above scrutiny. The RSS cannot
ask ordinary Indians to follow rules, while exempting itself from the same
standards. If workers, small associations, religious institutions, NGOs,
Trusts, Companies and citizens are expected to register, disclose, and pay
taxes, then the RSS too must set an example by abiding by the rules of the
land”.
The
letter raises eight points, seeking clarification, inter alia, its legal status
and organisational structure, sources of donations, contributions and income.
Mohan Bhagwat says he is not required to answer the letter stating that the RSS
is not required to register, as there are many organisations, including the
‘Hindu Dharm’, which have not been registered. So, the RSS is above the
constitution and the law of the land, while he gets Z+ security from the State
at the tax payers’ expense, and the organisation that he heads itself is
illegal and evades tax.
The
double standards of the RSS are exposed. In an article in The Wire,
Kunal Purohit, an independent journalist, says that 80% of the RSS affiliates
abroad are registered, and make their tax records public. The Sangh affiliates
are terrified of violating laws abroad. While the RSS has refused to register
in India, it has quietly got most of its global affiliates registered. There is
no explanation why its standards for registration differ organisations across
national boundaries. The RSS network spreads 38 countries outside India, and
includes more than 2500 organisations in these countries.
In
2014, when Modi came to power, the RSS had around 44,000 shakhas, in over
29,000 locations, and by March 2026 the number of shakhas has crossed 88,000 in
55,000 locations across the country. It is a massive growth and exponential
expansion. The RSS has been cited in several inquiry reports as having been
involved in cases of communal riots over the years. Yet, it has grown in
strength, especially after the BJP formed the first coalition government at the
Centre in 1998.
Secrecy
is central to the RSS’s functioning. Kunal Purohit argues that “while
it is well known that the RSS has representatives attached to all ministries
and to embassies abroad, the fact that it is unregistered helps to keep its
real role unaccountable. It does not have a membership roster, or names of
members. This is something that helped it wriggle out of the charge that
Gandhi’s assassin Nathuram Godse remained a member of the RSS. Registering
would take the invisibility cloak away. The RSS had claimed that Godse had left
the RSS".
And
according to Rohit Chopra, Professor of Communications at the Santa Clara
University in California, "violence has been central to the Hindu
nationalist project. If you are a registered organisation, it becomes easier
for the State to target you. But when you aren’t registered, your members are
not identifiable and you can’t be held responsible for their actions.”
So,
the cat has come out of the bag. By not registering, the RSS wants to have
immunity from any penal action for criminal activities of its members and the
Sangh Parivar. It is high time the RSS is registered and made accountable. It
is very dangerous to allow an unregulated communal organisation to have a free
run to meddle with the destiny of the nation.
Comments
Post a Comment