‘Modi, a consummate showman’!

 



‘Modi, a consummate showman’!

The sudden announcement of convening a five-day special session of the parliament from 18th to 22nd September,2023, without agenda and keeping it a secret, has raised suspicion of a hidden motive behind the move.  The fear and anxiety and speculation of surprises, like change in the name of India; preponing the Lok Saha election scheduled in 2024; and holding simultaneous elections for Lok Sanha and State Assemblies in the name of ‘one nation, one election’ are set at rest at last, with both the Houses of Parliament adjourned sine die, four days after.

 

Former Home Minster Chidambaram in his column Style, Substance and Slippery Ice says, “Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a consummate showman...he knows how to occupy the camera frame without yielding an inch of space to any of his ministers” (IE 17/9).  A few recent events amply demonstrate that Modi is a great event manager, projecting and promoting his self-image.

 

Chandrayaan-3 Mission

 

On 23 August, 2023, ISRO’s Chandrayaan-3 successful soft landed on the south pole of the moon. It is the result of the collective efforts of successive governments to promote space research. India’s first Prime Minister Pandit Nehru was responsible for establishing the Indian National Committee for Space Research (INCSR) in 1962 with the help of Homi Bhabha and Vikram Sarabhai. On 15 August 1969, the INCSR was renamed as the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), headed by Sarabhai.  And after his sudden death, that created a vacuum in the leadership of ISRO, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi wrote a letter on 7 January 1972 inviting the Indian scientist Satish Dhawan, who was on sabbatical at the California Institute of Technology, the US, to return to India and take the leadership of the ISRO. Dhawan accepted the invitation and took up the chairmanship of the ISRO with HQs at Bangalore.

 

The Indian government gave him full freedom to run the ISRO as he thought it appropriate. The Chandrayaan-1 was a success in 2009. Chandrayaan-2 failed in 2019. And the success of Chandrayaan-3 mission is a tribute to the devotion and dedication of hundreds of scientists and technologists, including Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar an A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, over a period of six decades. The space programme has been viewed from a developmental perspective, and not an instrument of muscular nationalism that Modi is trying to present. There is a continuity in governance. But J.P. Nadda, BJP’s President, denied this when he said: “I would like to thank Prime Minister Narendra Modi…Under his leadership, the country is creating new feats of success, carving a unique space for itself in the field of space exploration. The success would not have been possible without the Prime Minister’s relentless efforts” (IE 25/9). The success of Chandrayaan-3 is projected as the achievement of the Modi government.   

 

G-20 Summit

 

So much hullabaloo is created about the G-20 Summit held in New Delhi on 9th and 10th September and its India’s Presidency. The Presidency is given through rotation among the member countries in alphabetic order.  In fact, it was India’s turn to host the Summit last year, but India requested Indonesia to host it instead and expressed desire to host the Summit in 2023, as a prelude to the general election. That is how the hype was created around the Summit, as an achievement of the Modi government. India spent more than Rs.4000/- for the Summit. Re-carpeted roads, trees, potted plants, grass lights, sculptures and billboards came up all over Delhi, covering the filth and dirt in slums with huge green sheets all along the routes, so as to hide the poverty and inhuman living conditions of India’s poor, from the delegates.  There was only one face everywhere, that of Modi. Even the visiting leaders were not allowed a tiny bit of space in any billboard.  And at the Summit, the Prime Minister did not allow the media, including the American contingency of journalists who accompanied President Biden, to have any press conference of questions and answers.  It was the first time that the heads of the two super powers Xi Jinping and Vladmir Putin of China and Russia chose not to attend the Summit.

 

The Delhi Declaration reiterated members commitment to “inclusive, equitable, high-quality education”. How India, with the lowest per capita income of some 2000 US dollars among G-20 countries and massive privatisation of education, could ensure high-quality education?  As Chidambaram says, “At present, India is nowhere near the top of the Group of 20. It is at the bottom in terms of per capita income, Human Development Index, Labour force participation rate, Global Hunger and in some other parameters.” What have the common people of India gained from the Summit? The event served only the political agenda of the ruling dispensation; to project it as a great achievement during election campaigns.

 

This is how Jairam Ramesh commented on the Delhi Declaration;” Here’s yet another example of the staggering hypocrisy of the self-styled Vishwa guru.  At the Global level, in the G-20 declaration para 78, he commits to respecting religious and cultural diversity and promoting dialogue and tolerance. At home in India, he refuses to act on ethnic violence in Manipur …He remains silent on hate speeches, lynchings, targeted killings, and attack on holy places. His party has torn apart the social fabric of the nation” (The Hindu 11/9).

 

Special Session of Parliament

 

The 28 opposition parties of INDIA Alliance held meeting in Mumbai on 31t August and 1 September to save ‘constitution and democracy’ and fight collectively against the BJP.  On the day when the Alliance met, the Modi government made a sudden and surprise announcement of convening a special session of Parliament without giving any reason.  Speculations ran riot about the motive of the government, which is known for taking such decisions, keeping the people in dark. At the G-12 Summit, the President invitation for a dinner was issued in the name of ’President of Bharat’, instead of India, and even the name plate of Modi at the Summit table displayed ‘Prime Minister of Bharat’, giving rise to speculation that the government intended to change the name of the country to ‘Bharat’ during the special session, though the Article 1 of the Constitution clearly states ‘The India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.’ Simultaneously, the government also announced its intention to have ‘One nation, one election’ leading to widespread rumor and speculation that a law would be passed accordingly during the special session. It announced the setting up of a panel headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind.  It is the first time that a former President is made the chairman of a government panel. A few days later a panel of eight member, including the leader of the largest party in Lok Sabha-Congress- Adhir Rajan Choudhury, was announced to examine the proposal for one nation, one election; and submit report at the earliest. Choudhury instantly refused to be a member of the committee, calling the excise an eyewash and that he ‘cannot be part of the committee, the terms of refence of which have been prepared in a manner to guarantee its conclusions.’ That leaves the committee with seven members- Amit Shah, Ghulam Nabi Azad, N.K. Singh, Subhash Kashyap, Harish Salve and Sanjay Kothari -who are known for holding pro-establishment views. This is setting of yet another narrative to show that the government means business and Modi is not afraid of taking hard decisions.

 

Women Reservation Bill

 

The Women Reservation Bill was hanging fire for the past three decades. The Bill reserving 33% of seats for women in Lok Sabha and State Assemblies was passed in 2010 in Rajya Sabha during the UPA regime.  The Bill was defeated by seven votes om Lok Sabha.  Now suddenly on the opening day of the special session of Parliament on 18 September, the Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal tabled the Women Reservation Bill (Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam) in Lok Sabha, as 128th Amendment to the Constitution, providing 33% reservation of seats for women. The opposition parties supported Bill, asking the law to be implemented immediately with a sub-quota for the OBCs. However, the Bill was passed in Lok Sabha without amendments moved by the opposition, 454 members voting for the Biil and two members of the AIMIM voting against it, and in the Rajya Sabha all 215 members present unanimously voted for the Bill, with a caveat that the law would come into force only after the General Census and the Delimitation of Constituencies, hopefully by 2029, as assured by Home Minister Amit Shah. The reservation will have a life span of 15 years.   The Opposition, though know that the law cannot be implemented immediately, voted for the Bill, as they don’t want to be seen opposing the measures to empower women in the changed political environment.

 

It is strange that the conditional Bill is passed without any timeline as to when the law is likely to commence.  What is the purpose of passing a law, that serves as a postdated cheque, which is likely to bounce?  And yet BJP’s women wing organized a ‘thanksgiving show’ for Narendra Modi on 22 September, shouting Modi hai to munkin hai in unison- a premature celebration to flatter him. A pleased Modi responded: "The passage of the Bill marks the fulfilment of Modi’s guarantee that he will usher in a new era of women-led development.  Our BJP government has the privilege of fulfilling the dreams of millions of mothers and sisters” (TOI  23/9). The Census and the Delimitation are a long-drawn-out process. And “it is unfortunate that implementation is being linked to delimitation for the principle of having a third of seats reserved for women has nothing to do with the territorial limits of constituencies or the number of Assembly or Lok Sabha constituencies in each State” (Editorial, The Hindu 21/9).

 

Rahul Gandhi at a press conference on 22 September, said, the law perhaps would not see the light of the day for years.  He accused the government of resorting to a diversionary tactic.  If the INDIA Alliance comes to power at the Centre, after the general election next year, implementation of the law may be expedited, even by amending the law to remove the conditions. 

 

The special session of the Parliament ended abruptly a day earlier, once the purpose is served: the discussion on the so-called achievements of the Modi government- the landing of Chanrayaan-3 on the moon, the success of G-20 Summit and passing of the Women Reservation Bill- all this meant to show case the new Parliament House. On 19 September, which happed to be the Ganesh Chaturthi, the MPs walked from the Old iconic Parliament House to the New Parliament Building with great funfair, holding copies of the Constitution, provided by the Government, that did not have the words ‘Socialist Secular’ in the Preamble.  Predictably, President Murmu was not part of the celebration of the entry to the new Parliament Building, just as she was excluded when it was inaugurated four months ago. What was the special session about? All this could have been done in winter session. 

 

Super Luxury Lifestyle

 

There is another angle to the building of Prime Minister Modi’s image and his persona.  According to Dinesh K. Vohra of News Time, Modi is leading a super luxury lifestyle, unheard of in Indian history, the lifestyle not led even by Akbar, Ashoka and the Viceroy.  All the Presidents of India led a very ordinary life. Modi is the only Prime Minister who changes clothes several times a day, which are very expensive.  He flies in two exclusive VVIP flights, each worth Rs.8500 crore. Indira Gandhi used to travel in ordinary Air India planes. He uses car costing Rs.20 crore. Modi is a branded Prime Minister. All this super luxury lifestyle is at the expense of taxpayers’ money, while he talks all the time of being the son of a Gharibi chaiwallah. He markets the Gharibi. His new Prime Minister’s House is being constructed at the staggering cost of around Rs.500 crore. Lal Bahadur Shastri was very poor, yet he never drew the full salary and had to take government loan to buy a car. He did not have an overcoat when he went to Tashkent to sign the peace accord with Ayub Khan.

 

 

 

Comments