How
India became a political and economic appendage of Britain!
The East India
Company was founded in 1600, with the proclamation of Queen Elizabeth granting
it the trading rights. Its first ship reached Surat in 1608. Sir Thomas
Roe visited the Court of Emperor Jahangir in 1615 and obtained the permission
to trade. The East India Company, interested in spice trade, gradually expanded
its trade to include the items such as cotton, silk, indigo, saltpetre, tea, and opium to its wares;
it also participated in the slave trade. Initially it followed
a peaceful trade policy, but took advantage of the deteriorated
political situation in India. How could a trading company conquer India
and establish the British Rule in such a vast country for two hundred years? It is a fascinating story. There is no parallel in history!
After Robert Clive
defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah-the last Nawab of Bengal- at the battle of Plassey in
1757, Bengal, Bihar and Orissa came under the direct control of the East India
Company, and with the defeat of the Marathas in 1818 its political supremacy in
India was complete. The British became the unchallenged
sovereigns of a great part of India, governing the country directly.
The
British people practiced with great success the method of making the people of
India pay for their own conquest. The East India Company plundered the
wealth of India and promoted the industrial development in England and then
used India’s raw materials to promote the factories in England. Adam Smith in
his book The Wealth of Nations said: “The government of an exclusive
company of merchants is perhaps the worst of all governments for any country
whatever. It is the interest of the East India Company considered as sovereigns
that the European goods which are carried to their Indian dominions should be
sold there as cheaply as possible; and that the Indian goods which are brought
from there should be sold as dear as possible.”
Jawaharlal
Nehru in The Discovery of India gave an account of India at the time when the East
India was establishing its rule: India was a highly developed manufacturing
country exporting her manufactured products to Europe and other countries, with
the Indian hand-loom supplying the markets of Asia and Europe. India was as
advanced industrially, commercially, and financially as any country prior to
the industrial revolution. The foreign political domination led to a rapid
destruction of the Indian economy.
The
East India Company had carried a very profitable business by selling Indian
made linens and woollens and silks and embroidered goods. English goods
could enter India without the payment of any duty, but the Indian goods
entering England were heavily taxed to discourage the Indian products.
That was how “India, which had been for hundreds of years the Lancashire of the
Eastern world… lost her position as a manufacturing country and became just a
consumer of British goods…the East India Company crushed every Indian industry
which came into conflict with British industry.”
Consequently,
millions of artisans were thrown out of work. The poor, homeless,
workless, starving artisans fell back on the land and. became landless
labourers, a large number of them starved to death. Most of these weavers and
artisans had lived in towns and cities. Now that their occupation was gone they
drifted back to the land and to the villages. And the population of the towns
went down, while the population of the villages went up. In other words,
India became less urban and more rural. This process of ruralisation of India continued
throughout, making the country poor and impoverished.
The
establishment of British rule in India was an entirely navel phenomenon, not
comparable with any other invasion or political change. India had been
conquered before, but by the invaders who settled within her frontiers and made
themselves part of her life. She had never lost her independence, never
been enslaved. The Afghans, the Mughals and all others, who invaded and
conquered India, had accepted India as their homeland, bringing their language,
culture, and religion in the process, resulting in their synthesisation as the Din-e-Illahi
of Akbar demonstrated. India had never been drawn into a political and economic
system whose centre of gravity lay outside her soil, never been subjected to a
ruling class which was permanently alien in origin and character.
India
had been a melting pot for ages, absorbing and assimilating whoever came to
her. And “every previous ruling class, whether it had originally come
from outside or was indigenous, had accepted the structural unity of India’s
social and economic life and tried to fit into it. It had become Indianised and
had struck roots in the soil of the country. The new rulers were entirely
different. Now racialism became the acknowledged creed and this was
intensified by the fact that the dominant race had both political and economic
power, without check or hindrance.”
The
Indian native rulers, barring a few, did not resist the foreign enemy; instead
they fought among themselves, fell over to appease the East India Company,
helping to consolidate its hold on India. They were more pre-occupied with
political intrigue, hurting each other. There were many Jayachandras among
them. The Indian states, about 600, feudal and autocratic in nature, had
entered into treaties with the East India Company, accepting its suzerainty.
The British Crown or Parliament had nothing whatever to do with the treaties.
Nearly all these states could be traced back to the beginnings of British rule;
they had no earlier history, exercising the privilege of power without
responsibility. The doctrine of British paramountcy was proclaimed to establish
the supremacy over them, with 11 Provinces already under the direct British
control. The Indian states were rightly called “Britain’s fifth column in
India.”
Thus
India, the cradle of civilization with rich cultural heritage, had become for
the first time a political and economic appendage of another country, the
imperial Britain, and a colony at that, losing her freedom and entity. A dark
chapter, indeed, in her long glorious history!
Comments
Post a Comment